Welcome to my weekly fantasy golf model for the 2021 The Genesis Invitational!
Beginning in 2020, I developed a weekly rubric which offers a clear-cut ranking system based on data points weighted in a formula. So far, it’s been a tremendous success. Here’s a look at the PGA Tour winners in the restart and where they landed in the model:
- Charles Schwab Challenge at Colonial: Daniel Berger – No. 21
- RBC Heritage: Webb Simpson – No. 7
- Travelers Championship: Dustin Johnson – No. 10
- Rocket Mortgage Classic: Bryson DeChambeau – No. 2
- Workday Charity Open: Collin Morikawa – No. 11
- the Memorial Tournament: Jon Rahm – No. 6
- WGC FedEx St. Jude Invitational: Justin Thomas – No. 6
- PGA Championship: Collin Morikawa – No. 13
- The Northern Trust: Dustin Johnson – No. 20
- BMW Championship: Jon Rahm – No. 2
- US Open: Bryson DeChambeau – No. 9
- Sanderson Farms Championship: Sergio Garcia – No. 40
- CJ Cup at Shadow Creek: Jason Kokrak – No. 17
- Zozo Championship at Sherwood: Patrick Cantlay – No. 9
- The Masters: Dustin Johnson – No. 7
- Mayakoba Golf Classic: Viktor Hovland – No. 5
- Sentry Tournament of Champions: Harris English – No. 13
- Sony Open in Hawaii: Kevin Na – No. 33
- Farmers Insurance Open: Patrick Reed – No. 8
- Waste Management Phoenix Open: Brooks Koepka – No. 10
- AT&T Pebble Beach Pro-Am: Daniel Berger – No. 1
Let me walk you through the rubric’s tenets and show off this week’s results.
To see our hidden picks and weekly model, join Forebucks!
For just $75 for 12 months or for free with a qualifying sportsbook deposit, Forebucks members get access to our winning weekly PGA Tour event model, in-depth DraftKings picks, searchable database of PGA Tour results from 2011-present and top-15 PGA Tour trends, as well exclusive members-only content.
You’ll also have access to our course fit modeling, Quality Stokes Gained data, course demand insights, as well individual access to fantasy expert Ryan Ballengee for your unique questions.
How the rubric works
The reason I’m calling this a rubric is because I think a model implies a guess about how the tournament will play out. I don’t think any model can do that. There are plenty of factors data can’t quantify, including luck of the draw, playing partners, hole locations, weather and sheer random stuff.
That’s why the rubric is rooted in things we can quantify more broadly without getting too into the weeds. I don’t believe specific statistics matter for each course. Each player is different, and they achieve their best results slightly differently, as our Course Fit tool indicates. A player can perform well on most PGA Tour courses doing things their way, and their past performance on a course is best indicative of their fit, not where they rank in certain categories.
That said, the biggest chunk of my rubric relies on strokes gained, as well our derivative, Quality Strokes Gained, which weights a player’s strokes gained against the depth of field they face. The rubric looks at this data over the longer term and medium term to derive a player’s quality across the tour and across different fields. In the fall of 2021, I included specific weighting of strokes gained and Quality Strokes Gained against the field strength that week, creating a range of comparison to see how players do against particular competition.
Next, the rubric accounts for two factors I look at every week: current form in the last five PGA Tour events played and their average strokes gained on the host course in the last three years.
All told, the model is designed to point out quality players and boost those middling players who have good current form or good course history.
2021 The Genesis Invitational rankings
You’ll see with the rubric that I’ve listed the top 75, as well their current betting odds and DraftKings price.
This week at Riviera should be a lot of fun. It’s the best field of the year so far, and they’re playing one of my favorite courses. Our model doesn’t emphasize course history perhaps as much as others, so that’s why Dustin Johnson isn’t No. 1. He’s the best Riv player in the field statistically. Also, the long-term nature of the model messes with DJ a bit.
Click header to sort; the better their position, the more the rubric likes them
|POS||PLAYER||PTS||DK PRICE||DK RANK||ODDS||ODDS RANK|
|26||Varner III, Harold||0.567||6700||74||15000||48|
|69||Howell III, Charles||0.083||6800||69||15000||48|